September 8th 2010 at 12:19pm, By Dave Guerin
TEC is releasing education performance data today and I’ve put together a table below of qualification completions for TEIs – I’ve left out PTEs and OTEPs only because I haven’t got time to enter all the data, but I’ve added some notes on PTEs below. The measurement is: all qual completions multiplied by EFTS value/total EFTS enrolled in courses.
Qualification completions are not as clear cut as course completions, which I covered earlier today. That is because many students do enrol in a qualification but only intend to complete one or a few courses within that qual. Of course, TEC funds and desires quals, so the stat is important. Many providers also purposely enrol people in courses, knowing they won’t do the whole qual, so that’s a choice that will depress stats.
As with course completions, universities are at the top of this table, filling the first 5 places, as well as 8 and 9. Massey University, however, is down at 17th place, probably reflecting the lower completion rates on extramural qualifications (although I suspect that doesn’t explain the whole difference, as Massey has a lot of face to face students).
The 10 TEIs below 50% deserve some extra scrutiny, but I’m willing to give those ten a little more time to contextualise their situation (and take some time to think about it), as the issues are more complex. The Open Polytechnic has very, very low completion rates, but they’re at the sharp end of the course vs qual enrolment issue. Raukawa and Waiariki are next from the bottom of the list, but that’s probably related to them being on the bottom of the course completion table.
44 PTEs had qualification completion rates below 50%. On the other hand, 19 had 100% and another 20 had 90-99% qualification completion rates.
5 Responses to Qual Completions – TEI Ratings (Open Poly at Rock Bottom)
petrak
September 8th, 2010 at 1:01 pm
Dave
Keep in mind Qualifications Completed does not mean Qualifications Awarded.
Eric Crampton
September 8th, 2010 at 9:22 pm
I don’t follow this stuff much, but I’d heard rumour that “qualification completion” doesn’t track individual students. Rather, it takes the number of graduates in a year, divides by number of first year students, then calls that the completion rate. True?
Eric Crampton
September 8th, 2010 at 9:43 pm
Ah, you’d already covered that. Serves me right for reading in RSS order.
The figure on qualification completion rates is a bit of a nonsense, isn’t it? I mean, if a school started enrolling more first year students, it would show up as a big drop in its completion rates by construction.
Dave Guerin
September 9th, 2010 at 10:41 am
Petrak, you need to back up that statement. The SDR Manual says that the Qualification Completion File “contains records for individual students who have either graduated or have passed all the academic and practical requirements for the completion of a recognised qualification.” That seems to me as though it includes those awarded, or ready to be awarded, a qual.
Eric, the qual completion rate is affected by the denominator changing as enrolments change, but they were trying to find a balance between getting an annual figure and getting a more accurate cohort figure some years down the track. But in any case, the figures are best used to identify extreme performance, rather than worry about minor differences.
Jo Hymers
September 11th, 2010 at 8:55 pm
What’s concerning is that the stats released are not a complete and balanced picture and have not taken in to consideration a few factors that are important in showcasing sub-sector specific stats.