ED Blog is for people working in and around NZ tertiary education who care about policy, strategy and results.
April 21st 2010 at 11:00am, By Dave Guerin
This post follows up from posts on wananga and university over-delivery in 2009 over the last two days – the university post explains the context. The short version is that providers are supposed to be in the 97-103% range, if 100% is their funding allocation
So, what’s an OTEP? Well, it’s an Other Tertiary Education Provider, which really means that it’s an organisation that doesn’t easily fit in the box, so that the government either gives it a different or a better funding deal than those that fit in neat boxes. Here’s some context on each:
So, how did they do in 2009? IPLS performed very poorly and will probably have to give a lot of money back, but 2 OTEPs were just over 100%. Four OTEPs were well over the 103% limit, all in the high-demand early childhood education and literacy areas. It will be interesting to see if anything happens there. I say that because OTEPs and PTEs often have quite high over-delivery and the management of it has not been such a major concern for the TEC. Up until 2008 all places at tertiary education institutions were funded, but PTEs had many unfunded places – I imagine some OTEPs may have been in the same position, or have been allowed to expand unfunded enrolments in the last two years.
| OTEPs | Over/Under Delivery |
| Institute of Professional Legal Studies | 69.5% |
| Taratahi Agricultural Training Centre | 101.1% |
| Te Kura Toi Whakaari o Aotearoa: NZ Drama School | 102.2% |
| Te Tai Puna Ora O Aotearoa/ NZ Childcare Assn | 106.5% |
| Te Kohanga Reo National Trust Board | 116.7% |
| NZ Playcentre Federation | 119.8% |
| Literacy Aotearoa | 134.8% |
| Total | 107.4% |
Tomorrow we’ll cover ITPs. Over/Under Delivery percentage is derived from data supplied by the TEC.
Education Directions Ltd (ED) improves tertiary education's impact on lifting workforce productivity. We do that by linking the key players in tertiary education through information, strategy and policy.
ED Blog covers New Zealand tertiary education news and views. Comments and guest posts are welcome. If you have a news tip, please contact us.
ED Insider provides strategic information and analysis for tertiary education professionals - it's the big brother of ED Blog. Check it out now!
3 Responses to OTEPs Over-Delivery in 2009
Stephen Carr
April 22nd, 2010 at 10:26 am
Hi
I should just point out that Taratahi is not a PTE, but is certainly true that our unique status and method of establishment way back in 1919 does give us a “different” look to many training providers. Ultimately our Board reports to the Minister of Agriculture, so this together with our Act of Parliament makes us very different to a PTE!
Dave Guerin
April 22nd, 2010 at 1:19 pm
Taratahi is designated by NZQA as a PTE (http://nzqa.govt.nz/providers/results.do?regionCode=0&typeCode=PTE&nameQuery=taratahi), but its formal legal status is as a Crown entity (from memory). It is also classed as an OTEP by the TEC. So it’s fair to say that “PTE” is not the best term to describe Taratahi, but it is one of the terms that can be used.
My colleague David Choat and I were discussing this issue by email yesterday in relation to an MOE Youth Training report that broke PTEs down into many categories. While many organisations are classed as PTEs, they may also have other conflicting designations, such as Taratahi’s OTEP status or a city/district council.
Disclosure: I have done several projects for Taratahi over the years, including one last year.
Stephen Carr
April 22nd, 2010 at 4:32 pm
It is true that some organisations class us as a PTE. NZQA do it because OTEP does not appear on their pulldown pick list!