<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Value of Vocational Education Debate</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ed.co.nz/2010/02/15/value-of-vocational-education-debate/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ed.co.nz/2010/02/15/value-of-vocational-education-debate/</link>
	<description>Tertiary education news and views</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 21:02:11 +1300</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Williams</title>
		<link>http://www.ed.co.nz/2010/02/15/value-of-vocational-education-debate/comment-page-1/#comment-48</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Williams</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Feb 2010 12:14:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ed.co.nz/?p=199#comment-48</guid>
		<description>Absent data, these points are hard to separate. One aspect of the Australian dialogue I enjoy is the availability of data including data on the internal returns to various different programs. They of course are too broad, ie advanced diplomas, diplomas and Cert IIIs have positive IRR, but at least its not theoretical.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Absent data, these points are hard to separate. One aspect of the Australian dialogue I enjoy is the availability of data including data on the internal returns to various different programs. They of course are too broad, ie advanced diplomas, diplomas and Cert IIIs have positive IRR, but at least its not theoretical.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

