PM’s Statement – Tertiary Education Impact

February 9th 2010 at 3:10pm, By Dave Guerin

The PM gave his statement to Parliament just after 2pm and there are some big announcements for tertiary education (it wasn’t all about property investors’ tax breaks!). The overall sentiments are pretty universal, but the question is whether the detailed policies will match them – at this stage we can’t be certain, but a lot more detail will be needed. This post provides the main excerpts and some initial thoughts.

We must ensure that our young people have the skills that employers demand and that will lead to productive well-paying jobs. New Zealand simply can’t afford a future where 20 percent of our workforce does not have the skills necessary for modern jobs.

Nor can we afford to get anything less than maximum value for the hundreds of millions of taxpayers dollars that we invest in our schools and tertiary institutions.

This year National will progress the education reforms that are necessary to address underachievement in our schools, improve young New Zealanders’ job opportunities and drive improved educational performance across the board.

We will implement a range of reforms to lift the performance of these schools, and ensure that where children need extra help they get it. This will include improving the training of our teachers, both in our training institutions and in professional development programmes; refocusing the tens of millions currently aimed at struggling students; and intervening more aggressively in schools which are consistently failing their students.

Trades training in schools gets a mention. It looks like teacher registration and/or salary rules might be adjusted to enable tradespeople to get into the classroom – that’s a good chnage as there are some silly rules there that have more to do with industrial negotiations than education.

The Government’s reforms in education will extend well beyond our primary schools.

In particular, we will be stepping up our push to ensure secondary-aged pupils have greater opportunities to learn trades and practical skills in schools and training centres. We don’t accept that a university education is a prerequisite for a good job, and we don’t think our school system should function as if it is.

So we are determined to ensure our secondary schools provide more students with the practical and trades skills that will empower them to enter further training or employment once they leave school.

This year we will make legislative and funding changes to modernise our secondary schools. These changes will ensure that schools can access the trades and technology expertise they need; give them greater flexibility over their timetables; and ensure they can access the classrooms, equipment and expertise of other training providers.

We will also be continuing the reforms necessary to support our Youth Guarantee policy of providing 16- and 17-year-olds with the option of pursuing their education in the setting which best suits their needs, be it a school, polytechnic, workplace or other training provider.

And tertiary education hasn’t been forgotten – there are “increasingly urgent problems”! The greater focus on courses with high dropout rates is good, but the implementation of such policies has been weak in the past – Steve Maharey announced a seemingly tough scheme in 2002 or 2003 but it had no real effect. At a time when TEC is sending providers 30 page summaries of performance data, it will be hard to get a laser-like focus on poor performing courses. Using hundreds of variables to measure performance just doesn’t work and is too easy to fudge (”well, I know we didn’t perform on items 42-57, but look how well we did on 62-78…”)

Finally, the Government will be addressing the increasingly urgent problems in our tertiary education sector.

We are concerned that as a consequence of previous ad-hoc policy changes, there are a large number of tertiary programmes, particularly below degree-level, that have drop-out rates as high as 50 percent, and that some of these programmes fail to properly equip students for the jobs they seek.

We simply must improve the value we get from our tertiary education investment, both on behalf of taxpayers and employers, and on behalf of the students who take these courses.

So this year the Government will be progressing the policy changes needed to ensure that tertiary education providers provide courses that are relevant to the modern job market and that are of a consistently high quality.

Universities will apparently get some freedom from regulation, which is probably good as they seem to operate within a good incentive framework – no big problems and some excellent performance.

We are also concerned that our universities, thanks to an inflexible and bureaucratic funding and policy framework, are finding it increasingly difficult to produce the world-class graduates New Zealand’s economy demands. We will be working with the universities to ensure Government policies support their drive for excellence and equip our best and brightest with the skills for New Zealand’s future.

Finally, it seems that poorly performing students might find it hard to access student support – this mirrors the growing university practice of not reenrolling poor-performing students, as they have better qualified applicants to choose from.

We will also take a careful look at the policy settings around student support to ensure that taxpayers’ generosity is not being exploited by those who refuse to take their tertiary studies seriously, or who show little inclination to transition from tertiary training into work.

News Beat 9 Feb

February 9th 2010 at 9:03am, By Dave Guerin

This is the tertiary education news beat for today – upcoming posts today will cover booming enrolments and the new(ish) Tertiary Education Strategy.

  1. Darel Hall’s first post for ED Blog yesterday went viral after it was picked up by Russell Brown at Public Address - welcome to the hundreds of new readers and congrats to Darel on a great debut.
  2. A lovely graduation story from Waiariki Institute of Technology covers a new mum who had her baby in class for the first six weeks – obviously lovely classmates and tutors too!
  3. There were five female moas to each male one, according to a Marsden Fund-backed University of Canterbury team, mainly because female moa were bigger and kept the best food areas. The Marsden Fund backs blue skies research, so don’t expect immediate application from this project (or resurrected moas).
  4. The Te Wananga o Aotearoa waka was up at Waitangi at the weekend.
  5. NMIT is launching a new KiaOraMai programme designed for entry-level employees working across the range of service industries, including hospitality, accommodation, travel and transport, tourism events and activities, retail, hairdressing, beauty and spa. It has been developed with Ministry of Tourism funding by the Tourism Industry Assn and SITA, the Services Industries Training Alliance (which includes ATTTO, HSI, HITO, Retail Institute, Skills Active, and Tranzqual). NMIT is one of the first providers, while its good to see SITA working well as a group of industry training organisations.
  6. In overseas news, the University of Phoenix has a 2-year degree offshoot, Axia College, with 200,000 students, that appears to compete directly with community colleges (Phoenix’s main operation targets mature students). There’s an interesting comparison (well, for me anyway). HT AACC

National Standards – Not a Bad Idea

February 8th 2010 at 10:38am, By Darel Hall

Darel is a new guest blogger (see profile).

This contribution was originally quite sarcastic.  I went through all what I thought to be the supposed problems with education that national standards for primary schools were, according to the Minister,  meant to solve and essentially pointed out that these were all known, and asked why the supposed problems weren’t being dealt with head on rather than obliquely through the standards.

It came out wrong, because I support national standards.  In secondary school and for post-school adults, particularly at levels 1 – 4 they have proven useful.  I’ve never been a zealot about it; I see them as a limited success.  But I was never convinced that they could promise more than being a useful method of assessment.

The problems highlighted in the Minster’s most recent statements are: some teachers are bad, most primary principals are bad, some report cards don’t say much, and too many kids aren’t getting educated enough.

Apparently an ERO report says 30% of primary teachers are doing a bad job.  So if that is known, what are we waiting for – do something about the teachers.  Maybe better selection for training (it is apparently difficult to not get accepted), better incentives for teachers (pay, conditions, professional development), change the system so that terrible teachers get exited more easily, support poorer teachers who want to do a reasonable job (surely the vast majority of the 30%) through training, mentoring, etc.  It’s only hard because it’s not cheap.

Apparently ¾ of principals don’t set expectations of high achievement.  Maybe only a ¼ of kids are capable of high achievement, but if indeed there is a travesty with the vast majority of primary principals, can we do something about that now?   Again, I find it extraordinary to believe that more than a handful of primary principals are unwilling or unable to educate pupils to the best of their abilities with the resources they have.

Some report cards from some schools are bad according to the Minister.  Is there a template?  Is there training?  Are teachers afraid of telling parents their kids just aren’t very academically gifted?  Why should I believe that any of the current problems communicating with parents will be solved with the report against a standard?  By the way, I also believe the report is a useful device, it’s just that the context is also going to be important and if that isn’t being communicated now then it also won’t with the new system.

Lastly, there is a 20% tail of kids doing really poorly.  We know that.  We’ve known that for a long time.  Again the problem is only hard because it is expensive.  It’s why the last government tried, for example, some useful but flawed polices in early childhood education.

So, we have at least four big problems that standards are supposed to significantly address. Once we’ve spent $26m on getting teachers up to speed on the standards then there is $36m to spend on the kids.  Over three years.  For the 150,000 kids the Minister has identified that have a problem (the 20% tail).   Do the math.  It’s not a lot.  Follow the money.  It tells you exactly how important the policy is and how much it will do.  Spending doesn’t necessarily equal results, but it usually does.  If the most important policy shift in decades in a multi-billion budget area is capturing tens of millions you know it isn’t. 

This policy starts with the premise of so many education policies – that schools can make up for poor parenting.  Maybe that’s where a little of the extensive political capital of this government could be wisely spent.  How about some long-term social engineering that changes societal expectations of schools and the wider education system?

National standards are good at providing a bench mark for assessing.  They don’t teach, deal with home life problems, don’t train teachers, don’t make parents give a stuff about their children, don’t make parents read to their children or provide the money needed for the kids that can benefit from extra teaching.  They don’t even ensure a good assessment and moderation system.

So after a few more discussions the reason why I was so annoyed slapped me in the face like a spring-loaded mackerel.  What is really annoying me is the attempt to encase a moderately useful idea in metaphoric silver and treat it like a high powered projectile. 

The sizzle of the sell won’t match the taste of the policy substance.  Parents and the wider public will become more frustrated and cynical about politicians, education officials and education policy.  Trust in institutions and those leading them will erode another little bit more.  And it is needless. 

The policy is likely to produce small but statistically significant results and that is what should have been sold.

Instead there is an unnecessary battle the government has started with unions which it didn’t need to buy into.  It doesn’t even matter if the unions are utterly defeated in the battle.  The government has created a war it can only lose – expectations created by government that all these matters will be solved will not happen, and parents will know it – and no spin, no blame-shifting will solve this political problem. 

This silver bullet hides a heart of kryptonite.

ITP Council Musical Chairs 4 – Otago

February 8th 2010 at 8:36am, By Dave Guerin

The ODT is covering Otago Polytechnic’s Council changes this morning in two stories on the general changes and student representation, and both are very interesting. (This is the fourth post in a series on ITP Council changes.)

Otago Poly CEO Phil Ker has proposed that no seat be reserved for him, as he “would always be at the table” – this is the first proposal I’ve seen of a CEO not being on the Council. He also recommended that staff and student representation be dealt with by subcommittees. The four Council-appointed seats should be taken by 2-3 people appointed on the basis of skills and 1-2 people nominated by local runanga.

Phil Ker recommended that the Council make appointments ASAP, so that they were made by the current Council, not the new one after May 1, but Graeme Crombie (Council Chair) and Mark Ryan (Deputy Council Chair) were reluctant to bind the new Council – that are both Ministerial appointees too. Decisions were pushed off to the next meeting.

The second story states that Otago Poly student rep Meegan Cloughley has given up on student representation on the new Council, as any seats would be hard to gain and easy to lose under a new Council dominated by Ministerial appointees – she characterised it as a “hostile takeover”. Instead she will be focusing on setting up a student subcommittee. I know Meegan and she’s made a difficult choice, but the right one in my view. Good luck to her.

News Round-Up 6 Feb

February 6th 2010 at 9:22am, By Dave Guerin

This is a new feature and I’d appreciate feedback. Next week we’ll probably introduce a newsfeed to the site as well.

  1. Lincoln University is seeking to convert a leasehold high country station into freehold, sparking fears of loss of public access – unlike most such issues, no overseas owners are involved! Some land will go to conservation estate but Lincoln wants to be able to carry outcommercial research activities without disruption on the rest of the land - The Southland Times.
  2. Aoraki Polytechnic Operations Manager Ben Lee has resigned and left yesterday, reports the Timaru Herald. I’m sad to see Ben go but changes often occur with a new CEO and the senior management structure is apparently under review. I’m sure Ben will be snapped up soon.
  3. The ODT has a profile of Otago University’s new student president, with a big year ahead involving voluntary student membership and challenges to the University’s Code of Conduct.
  4. The ODT also covers a $25m capital development plan at Otago Polytechnic, designed to fit within a $2.5m annual capital spend over a long period.

WITTling Down

February 5th 2010 at 9:33am, By Dave Guerin

Western Institute of Technology at Taranaki (WITT) needs to generate a surplus of 3% of revenue this year and next if they are to bed down their debt writeoff, according to the Taranaki Daily News. With a drop of $2.2m in funding next year after one-off funds end, WITT has started consultation with staff – it is looking at enrolment increases, fee increases and staff reductions.

As I wrote earlier in the week, the funding crunch for ITPs this year will be tough as they got a lot of extra money in this investment plan cycle that was targeted at transition or simply covering losses, whereas the Government now wants to fund results, rather than organisations. ITPs like WITT will have to make a strong case to make one-off funds into baseline, while fending off a sceptical TEC and Ministers, and other sectors putting up their own cases for the money (eg PTEs arguing for equal funding, universities arguing for research and quality provision, and ITOs arguing for productivity). My guess is that the government will keep the financial pressure on ITPs during this year, but I don’t see them (yet) going as far as they have with DHBs by implementing a forced common services model.

ITP Council Musical Chairs 3 – CEO, Student & Staff Roles

February 4th 2010 at 4:41pm, By Dave Guerin

Musical ChairsThis post reviews whether CEOs, students and staff should have designated roles on Councils – its the third in a series on ITP Council arrangements – and my view is “no, but”.

I’ve been a student rep on a Council (Victoria Uni, 1993) and I did a good job, as have most of my predecessors and successors. Vic students have had two reps on Council for 40 years, even though the law only requires one, but that second position was created after the student reps had built a reputation and an argument for it over years. The two roles have been maintained through generally solid performance by each year’s reps, based on the work of many other student reps and students’ assn staff. That’s the model that I prefer – appointment based on merit.

Staff and student reps can add something very useful to any tertiary education institution Council, but not just because they are a student or staff member. To be effective, the individual needs to have strong skills and they need an effective support network to boost their reach and credibility (unions and students’ associations could, but do not always, provide that). Support networks are even more important for student reps, as they often have one year terms, and institutional memory through staff and long-term student reps is crucial. Unfortunately, many ITP students’ assns do not have strong continuity. As ITPs design their new Council arrangements, I suspect that staff and student reps will fall by the wayside due to rationing of places, prior performance, prejudice on the part of other Council members and a poor case being put forward by the current reps (and their supporters). If the same debate around Council composition happened in universities, students and staff would most likely retain their places because they make a stronger contribution and the organisational culture supports them to do so – ITPs are different. Some good comments were made on this issue in an earlier post here.

CEOs should certainly have the skills, experience and support to contribute effectively to the Council – if they can’t, they are probably being performance managed out anyway! My preference, though, would be to keep them off the Council. It simply creates a clearer distinction between employer and employee, which is important for oversight of the CEO.  That said, this should be a choice for the Council to make, and they should be held accountable for it. I suspect that 18-20 of the 20 CEOs will stay on the Coucils after May 1.

UCOL made its decisions last week and has put its Council papers up online - the papers provide useful ideas (although I’m not sure that Mai Chen’s paper on whether a CEO should be on the Council should have been addressed to the current CEO – surely the Chairperson should have been briefing Mai, but the underlying process may have involved the Chair, of course). UCOL have appointed their CEO, Chair, Deputy Chair and Finance Ctte Chair as the four ongoing members – not staff or students to my knowledge.

In terms of making a case, it is curious to note that the UCOL Council did not consider any written input from staff or student groups at their meeting last week on this issue – surely this was a great chance to put forward a positive case? The TEU has complained today about the result, but what are they and NZUSA proactively doing for the other ITPs?

Unemployment Up, Enrolments ?

February 4th 2010 at 1:26pm, By Dave Guerin

The Household Labour Force Survey Dec 09 figures were released by Stats NZ this morning, with a big jump in unemployment to 7.3%, up 0.8% for the quarter. This is a very big shift – at the end of 08, most economists thought that unemployment would top out in the low 6% area, and earlier this week, they were picking 6.8%.

The tertiary education angle is that there will be continued high pressure for places in tertiary education this month. While the Survey released today showed that tertiary education participation was only up 2.3% from Dec 08 to Dec 09, more precise figures will start flowing from the TEC and providers in the next few weeks. I’ll provide updates as they arrive.

NZQA’s Good Job on Language Schools

February 4th 2010 at 7:02am, By Dave Guerin

I’ve criticised NZQA in the past about their work with English language schools (ELS) and not just when I represented the ELS sector. NZQA has been guilty of implementing some poorly designed systems over the years and following up very quickly. To be fair, the last Labour government shot from the hip on this issue and left officials scrambling around for quick answers.

But a few recent stories have shown NZQA performing well. Last year, a reality TV show that no-one ever watched scored a lot of coverage when it filmed ELS people allegedly selling business diplomas (ie the piece of paper, not the months or years of study!). This kind of thing happens regularly, and the TV crew did a public service by getting it on film. NZQA took a wee while to respond but they deregistered the private training establishment (PTE), NZ Academy of Studies. Last week they also deregistered City Language Academy (also in Auckland). NZQA identified the Director of City Language Academy as being involved in the alleged sale on TV. Good on them, especially since they seem to have followed good process and minimised room for appeals to drag on.

In another story, also written by Tom Hunt of the Dominion Post, the future of GEOS NZ is under threat. GEOS is a major Japanese company with schools around the world – one of the many big overseas firms operating in NZ. Whether GEOS NZ continues is up to their Japanese investors, as it should be, but the relveance to NZQA is that their student fee protection policy is working well. I was involved in setting up that policy, but it didn’t work for some years because there were too many options, hampering effective oversight by NZQA and economies of scale for the offerings. Now that the Public Trust has dominated the market, there is a reliable service for ELS, students and government. How it roughly works is that all upfront fees go into a trust fund and get paid out to an ELS on a weekly basis.

You might wonder why this matters, but the real beauty of it is that when an ELS closes, whether by NZQA or market reasons, all the unused fees are sitting in a trust account. That means that, before liquidation/deregistration, managers can make a business deal with another organisation to transfer stduents. If that can’t be done, then the students themselves can walk down the road. It also reduces the chances of people mismanaging the enormous positive cashflow that an ELS can generate. While none of this is sexy, and it does increase transaction costs and reduce cashflow, student fee protection has eliminated the “students on the street” story from the ELS market. That story was a periodic attack on the reputation, here and overseas, of every successful ELS and it is great that it has disappeared – the latest articles are nowhere near as damaging as they would have been a few years ago.

GEOS Australia is a different story, with 2,300 students affected, including students fees and accommodation money. I found an interesting angle on it all by a foreign English teacher in Japan. GEOS itself is an enormous company with about 500 schools in Japan and 50 plus around the world.

Quebec Fast-tracks Grads’ Citizenship

February 3rd 2010 at 5:37pm, By Dave Guerin

Quebec is offering degree graduates from its universities a fast-track to citizenship. As long as grads pass federal health and security checks, they will get citizenship. Immigration policy is a key element of export education marketing and Quebec’s premier promoted this policy in Mumbai on Monday, obviously targeting Indian students disenchanted with Australia. The story is from the Chronicle of Higher Education, which also referred to a Canadian government initiative to improve Indian student applicant acceptance rates. Looks like our competition is hotting up too.

Education Directions

Education Directions Ltd (ED) improves tertiary education's impact on lifting workforce productivity. We do that by linking the key players in tertiary education through information, strategy and policy.

ED Blog is for people working in and around NZ tertiary education who care about policy, strategy and results. Comments and guest posts are welcome. If you have a news tip, click here to contact us

  • TVHE » Key’s tax speech: [...] Behaviour, Brad Taylor, Public Address (1 and 2), The Standard, Homepaddock, Education Directi [...]
  • Hands up for Learning » 9th Feb: [...] Education Directions Gueast blogger Darel Hall takes apart the standards. link [...] [...]
  • Paul Williams: A great peice, thanks. I appreciate that the government were bound by their pre-election commitments [...]
  • Dave Guerin: Providers can sign up more students but TEC can sanction providers that go over 103% (ie 3% over cap [...]
  • Anatole Bogatski: Thanks Dave My understanding is that at this point TEC does not control the StudyLink loans and all [...]

@eddirections Twitter Feed – Sign Up

Facebook

RSS ED Blog Newsfeed

  • Open Polytechnic offers financial services training from afar February 9, 2010
    The Open Polytechnic is now a financial services training provider and with its specialisation in distance education, it will be ideal for many financial advisers who want to fit study in around work. […]
  • First students start bringing zest to city February 9, 2010
    With trailer loads of second-hand furniture heralding their arrival, the first students are starting to bring North Dunedin to life. Among those getting set for the year was Nicky Crawford. […]
  • NZ scientist attempts to break squid record February 9, 2010
    Source: NZPA Source: ONE NewsSepioteuthis Australis squid A New Zealand scientist is attempting to break his own world record for rearing deep sea squid in captivity. […]
  • Kiwi Game Developers Kick Off 48 Hour Global Game Jam February 9, 2010
    Over sixty computer game developers from Auckland, Hamilton and Dunedin have just completed a grueling 48-hour game making marathon. 140 locations around the world participated simultaneously in the Global Game Jam, with New Zealand being the first country to begin. […]
  • Laid-off NMIT staffer upbeat on future February 9, 2010
    "One door shuts and another door opens," says Marlborough NMIT programme leader Anne Barrer after being made redundant this week. She is one of seven staff members in Marlborough and another 11 in Nelson to lose their jobs in an NMIT restructure after the Government capped its funding. […]
  • TEU Tertiary Update Vol 13 No 2 February 9, 2010
    NEW MINISTER OF TERTIARY EDUCATION The prime minister announced this week that he was appointing a new minister of tertiary education, Steven Joyce, to replace Anne Tolley who had been in the job for only a year. […]
  • Witt in debt deal February 9, 2010
    After 18 long months of negotiations, Witt has finally reached an agreement with the Government over its $17 million debt. The polytech's council unanimously agreed to the conditions of two loan agreements yesterday – one which wipes $12 million of debt and the other which allows the further $5 million to be. […]
  • UCOL council loses 5 seats February 9, 2010
    UCOL stripped its council from 13 to eight members yesterday, removing guaranteed seats for a student, staff members and a labour representative. The changes follow the Education (Polytechnics) Amendment Bill, which was passed in December. […]
  • Tertiary portfolio too important to be part-time February 9, 2010
    Tertiary Education portfolio too important to be part-time job The appointment of a new minister of tertiary education confirms that tertiary education is too big a job for a minister who already carries other significant portfolios, said TEU national president Dr Tom Ryan. […]
  • Students Welcome New Minister For Tertiary Education February 9, 2010
    The New Zealand Union of Students' Associations (NZUSA) welcomes the appointment of Steven Joyce as the new Minister for Tertiary Education today and looks forward to working with him productively to maintain quality and access to tertiary education for all New Zealanders. […]
  • Industry Training Federation welcomes new Minister February 9, 2010
    Press Release - Industry Training Federation of New Zealand Industry Training Federation welcomes new Minister 26 January 2010 The Industry Training Federation has welcomed the appointment of Steven Joyce to the role of Minister for Tertiary Education. […]